<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fairness on reSAID Lab</title><link>https://resaid-lab.github.io/categories/fairness/</link><description>Recent content in Fairness on reSAID Lab</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://resaid-lab.github.io/categories/fairness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Long-Term Fairness and ML Safety</title><link>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fairsense/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fairsense/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many ML-enabled systems operate in dynamic environments: the system&amp;rsquo;s decisions
change the environment, and those changes feed back into its future inputs. Certain
self-reinforcing loops can amplify errors, entrench bias, and cause fairness
violations in the long term even when immediate outcomes are fair. In predictive
policing, for example, a model that flags a neighborhood as high-crime sends more
patrols there, producing more recorded arrests, which the model reads as even higher
crime. The same pattern appears in loan approvals that affect credit scores and in
medical risk scoring that influences treatment access.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fair-AutoML: Performance-Aware Fairness Repair</title><link>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fair-automl/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fair-automl/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bias mitigation algorithms typically work only in specific situations and often
repair fairness at the cost of large accuracy drops, making them impractical for
critical decision-making software. We treated fairness repair as a
performance-aware optimization problem: fix the bias in a buggy model without
ruining its accuracy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fair-AutoML, built on a state-of-the-art AutoML tool, made this concrete through
two changes to standard AutoML: an optimization function that incorporates
fairness objectives alongside accuracy, and a fairness-aware search space over
candidate model configurations. A search-space pruning method further reduced
computational cost and repair time.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Fairify: Fairness Verification of Neural Networks</title><link>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fairify/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/fairify/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We built Fairify, an SMT-based approach that verifies individual fairness of deep
neural networks in production. Individual fairness requires that any two individuals
who differ only in protected attributes such as race, sex, or age receive similar
predictions; unlike group metrics, it captures worst-case discrimination. The
property is hard to verify because it must be checked globally over the input
domain and because of the non-linear computation nodes in the network.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Causal Fairness in Machine Learning Pipelines</title><link>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/causal-fairness-pipelines/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://resaid-lab.github.io/projects/causal-fairness-pipelines/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most fairness research treated a machine learning model as a single black box, measuring bias only from its final predictions. Real pipelines, however, contain an ordered set of components — data filtering, imputation, encoding, feature transformation, training, tuning — and each can affect the fairness of the resulting model. We investigated fairness at the component level: using causal reasoning, we intervened on one stage at a time, constructed an alternative pipeline without that stage, and measured the resulting prediction disparity to attribute unfairness to specific components.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>